There is a new chapter in the life of IBM’s super computer, named Watson: IBM’s Watson goes to medical school. In colaboration with Dr. Herbert Chase of Columbia University, Watson is learning how to treat and diagnose ailments in the human body. In fact, Watson is doing well enough that this might be the harbinger [...]
Archive for the ‘ontology’ Category
IBM’s Watson heads to medical school
Posted in information retrieval, knowledge management, natural language processing, ontology, Uncategorized on May 24, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Cypher Natural Language to RDF/SPARQL transcoder – Wanted! Dead or Alive!
Posted in ontology, Text Annotation, Text Extraction, tools, tagged Cyper, Help, NLP to RDF, RDF, SPARQL on April 29, 2010 | 1 Comment »
I’m still looking for the holly grail to convert natural language to RDF. Today I was reading some interesting stuff about Cypher Natural Language to RDF/SPARQL transcoder. Cypher is an AI program that generates the .rdf (RDF graph) and .serql (SeRQL query) representations of plain language input, allowing users to speak plain language to update [...]
Tools: NLP2RDF
Posted in natural language processing, ontology, tools, tagged natural language processing, nlp2rdf, OWL, owld DL, RDF, stanford to rdf, triple extraction on April 28, 2010 | 3 Comments »
NLP2RDF is a framework that integrates multiple NLP tools and linguistic ontologies in order to explicate implicit meaning of natural language by means of RDF/OWL descriptions. Natural language ( a character sequence with implicit knowledge) is converted into a more expressive formalism – in this case OWL-DL – aiming to grasp the underlying meaning. This [...]
You need help with Protégé ?
Posted in ontology, tools on April 20, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
I found an interesting site where you can get some help\feedback about subjects related to Protégé Ontology Editor. Check it out: http://n4.nabble.com/Protege-Ontology-Editor-Knowledge-Acquisition-System-f136.html
ONKI – Finnish Ontology Library Service
Posted in news, ontology, tagged Culture Sampo, HealthFinland, MuseumFinland, onki, semantic web on April 19, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
The national Finnish Ontology Library Service, ONKI, is a centralized ontology library (including vocabularies and thesauri) used in Finnish library and related ontology for services, creating, publishing, and using them cost-efficient. ONKI helps to link data globally, making it compatible with the semantic web. They are currently employed for example in such as MuseumFinland, HealthFinland [...]
Human intervention in Knowledge Acquisition Process
Posted in knowledge representation, ontology, Uncategorized, tagged human validation, knowledge acquisition, knowledge discovery, knowledge representation, mining, ontologies, Text Mining on April 19, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
On of the Prymas‘ goals was to have a full automatically way to acquire and infer knowledge. But since designing and feeding domain ontologies does not follow a linear process, it involves numerous revisions before a final consensual solution is developed, it’s important to validate the results obtained at each step of the mining process. [...]
Ambiguity of the day
Posted in Methodology, ontology, tagged class, concept maps, concepts, individuals, ontologies, semantic networks, synonym, wordnet on April 19, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
“… semantic networks suffer from an inherent semantic ambiguity. For example, we were unable to differentiate individuals from concepts in the resulting concept maps. Moreover, due to the direct translation of written sentences into concept map sentences, various terms were used to express synonyms, resulting in further ambiguity …” Hummm…. interesting (or not). References: Building [...]
What is a Question and Answering System?
Posted in information retrieval, ontology, question and answering, trec, tagged compass, IR, q&a, trec, wikipedia, Wolframalpha on April 16, 2010 | 3 Comments »
In the scope of Information Retrieval (IR) systems, question and answering (QA) is the task of automatically answer questions formulated in natural language. To find the answer, the system may consult a stuctured database or a collection of unstructured text corpus, such as documents or wikipedia pages. Typical research problems over this kind of systems [...]
OWL 2.0 variants
Posted in knowledge representation, ontology, Uncategorized, tagged description logic, OWL, OWL 2, RDF, RDFS, semantic web on April 15, 2010 | Leave a Comment »
OWL 2.0 is a revision and extension of OWL 1.0 (Web Ontology Language), inheriting language features, design decisions, and use cases. Figure 1. The Structure of OWL 2.0 With the extension of OWL 1.0, new features are added: Improved syntactic sugar (e.g., disjoint union of classes), making relation easier to express. More forms of improving [...]
